Showing posts with label winning business. Show all posts
Showing posts with label winning business. Show all posts

Monday, January 28, 2008

What Competitive Intelligence Does Sales Want?

Sales (and companies in general) thrives on winning business. By putting an emphasis on winning, this implies that a sale is a competitive endeavor where there is often a winner and loser. And winning every contest is not an easy task. It takes skill, effort and an understanding of the game and its players.

Losing, on the other hand, is not very difficult at all. Every sales rep has a story about the time they didn’t prepare, research the opportunity, understand the competition or work hard enough to make the right value equation. The small amount of time that went into that opportunity was lost from the beginning. There was almost no chance of winning the business and the token efforts may have been less valuable than avoiding the situation altogether.

Sales professionals have spoken to us at Primary Intelligence, telling us exactly what they want at different stages of the sales cycle. The information is very enlightening. Most people would guess that “price” and “competitor’s price” would be on the list. They would be right. However, they’re not as high on the list as you might think.

When it comes to competitive intelligence, sales people want to know the following:

Before the sale
  • Which companies have needs I can fulfill?
  • What are the primary pain-points that I can use?
  • How will the competitors approach the same opportunity?
  • What advantages do I have over the competition?
  • What advantages do I have over the prospect’s in-house efforts?
  • Does this client have the ability to pay the price I’ll have to charge?


  • During the sale
  • Which competitors am I likely to see in this deal?
  • What are those competitors saying about their product/service/solution?
  • What are those competitors saying about my product/service/solution?
  • How do buyers make decisions (which people have to be involved?)
  • Which of my features is likely to be perceived as “must have” over the competition?
  • What price is the competition offering?
  • How can I be seen as the expert in this deal?


  • After the sale
  • What did I/we do to earn this business?
  • Where there any trouble spots that nearly cost us the business?
  • (If lost) Where did we fail to communicate value?
  • (If lost) Which competitor won and what terms did they use?
  • If I wanted to re-engage, what would it take to win back the business?
  • How can I win this type of deal in the future?
  • In the future, should I avoid this type of company in favor of others? (Is there something about this type of prospect that makes them less productive?)


  • Recommendation: Listen to the sales leaders and ground-level sales people and design your competitive intelligence program to accommodate their needs. You might find that your program changes away from scraping websites and reading 10-Ks to actively conducting 1st person research with your marketplace, either with Win Loss, Market Needs, Target Prospecting, Post-implementation and the like.

    In other words, your traditional competitive intelligence program that is built to support corporate objectives may not match up at all with what the sales people are looking for. However, considering that sales is the lifeline of your business, it might be wise to give them a little love and help them win more business. In the end, this is part of what makes top companies great.

    Now is the time for sales reps and managers to speak up and tell everyone what they want. If I have missed something, please post a comment in this blog, send me an email (cdalley@primary-intel.com) or call me (801-838-9600 x5050)

    Friday, January 18, 2008

    Podcast: Sales Intelligence + Sales Team = Big Success

    Recently, Dave Stein (CEO of ES Research Group) interviewed our CEO, Ken Allred on the affects of sales intelligence: competitive intelligence that can be brought to bear on all aspects of the sales process. His goal was to understand how Primary Intelligence uses intelligence to increase sales close rates.

    As Mr. Stein’s company focuses on the evaluation of sales training and enhancement companies. His reports detail the performance of key players like Miller Heiman, The Complex Sale, The TAS Group and dozens of others. His goal is to help companies that want to sell more find the right resources to meet their needs.

    To this end, Mr. Stein took time to understand how the right kinds of intelligence can be leveraged to provide:

  • Competitive advantages
  • Increased visibility into your company’s performance
  • Identification of your competitors’ movements

  • The audio program is 25 minutes long and can be downloaded here.

    If your responsibilities include sales management, sales training, competitive intelligence or marketing, this podcast is well worth your time.

    And, if you feel like you’re not sure where you stand in relation to the competition, you’ll find usable insights and take-aways you can use today.

    Wednesday, January 16, 2008

    Upcoming Webinar: Keys to a Win Loss Program that Works

    Your company knows that it needs feedback from the market to perform and a Win Loss program makes a lot of sense. Marketing can make adjustments. Sales can target their training. Product Development can build it closer to what the clients expect. Just one question:

    What is the most effective way to run a Win Loss campaign to develop all of this information?

    The opportunity to increase your sales and marketing success sits right at your doorstep. But, do you have everything you need to achieve the greatest potential? Can you make simple changes that will result in huge increases?

    Primary Intelligence invites you to a presentation that will show:
  • How sales and marketing can work together to build a world-class program
  • Common obstacles that derail Win Loss initiatives in the early phases
  • Tactics that increase interview response rates
  • Real-world stories from successful Win Loss practitioners showing their innovative uses of results


  • Register Here

    Keys to a Win Loss Program that WorksDate: Thursday, January 24, 2008
    Time:
    2:00 PM – 3:00 PM EDT
    1:00 PM – 2:00 CDT
    12:00 PM – 1:00 PM MDT
    11:00 AM – 12:00 PM PDT
    Duration: 1 Hour
    System Requirements:PC-based attendees: Windows® 2000, XP Home, XP Pro, 2003 Server, VistaMacintosh®-based requirements: Mac OS® X 10.3.9 (Panther®) or newer


    Those that will benefit include:
  • Marketing leaders
  • Market research managers
  • Market and Industry analysts
  • Product development managers
  • Sales leaders
  • Corporate leadership positions (CEO, CMO, CSO)

  • Space is limited. Reserve your Webinar seat now

    Friday, January 11, 2008

    Competitive Intelligence Newsletter – Can Sales People Sell through Change?

    This week, we examine the world of sales and the importance of monitoring their performance in the sea of change we call “their world.” Science has shown that many people (sales reps included) have difficulties accepting changes and variation that are common in business life. Primary Intelligence shows a way to head of problems before attitudinal issues hurt the pipeline.

    As always, if you would like to a no-cost semi-weekly subscription to the Primary Intelligence Competitive Intelligence Newsletter, send an email to info@primaryintelligence.com with your name and email address. You will receive the next issue.

    Cover Story
    You Moved My Cheese! How Can I Sell?
    By RoxAnne Loosle, Primary Intelligence
    A company's desire to reduce sales force turnover and to develop a confident sales force make tracking a company's sales force's attitudes very important. The vocal minority aren't always the best source on which to base sales initiatives or policies...(For more, click here)

    BlogCentral
    Competitive Intelligence Tip #1 for 2008 - Make Your CI Produce Revenue
    Information costs money? Intelligence makes money!” Essentially, any competitive information that a business manager acts on becomes intelligence...(For more, click here)

    The A-List Archive
    Bloomington Hospital & Healthcare Selects McKesson for Its Information Needs
    Originally Published in March 2005.
    Bloomington Hospital & Healthcare System's contracts for its health information systems were coming up for renewal, so the organization decided to reevaluate its options. It looked for a solution that could be integrated throughout the entire enterprise...(For more, click here)

    Monday, January 7, 2008

    Growing your Sales Skills with Feedback from Prospects

    Over the past couple of months, I have spent a good deal of time speaking with our clients (past and present) about their use of our services. For those not familiar with Primary Intelligence, we are a company that produces Win Loss analysis, a specific form of research based on your company’s recent sales opportunities.

    One of the reasons for the calls with our clients is to understand how they assimilate our data into their processes to be more effective. While we have many notions (based on assumptions) of how our clients should be able to find value in our services, it has been fascinating to “observe” how they are putting this program to work, either as a standalone or holistic sales intelligence program.

    When I finish this exercise, I’ll create a Sales Intelligence best practice report. Not only will in include best practices, it will also include some outlying innovations create by our base. If you would like to receive a copy of this, please send me a message (Chris, cdalley@primary-intel.com)

    In many of our most successful implementations, the sales group is in charge of the Win Loss program. While this might seem like a natural thing, Marketing and Competitive Intelligence departments are also interested in Win Loss for their own purposes.

    Those that are most committed to using research and client feedback to make improvements have implemented regular debriefs with the sales rep and their manager. These meetings do not have to be long and they certainly are not meant to devalue the efforts of anyone in the deal. Instead, the sales operations or sales training representative uses the client feedback to illustrate the real needs of prospects, talk about trends that are emerging from deals all over the company and reinforce specific skills that have been trained in the company.

    In these cases, sales reps are becoming more effective. And, interestingly, the more engaged the sales rep gets with the feedback, the more willing they seem to be to offer up more of their opportunities for review. Once they see Win Loss for what it is (building, training and improvement) rather than a witch hunt, the entire tone changes.

    Whether your company looks to 3rd-parties to deliver this feedback or maintains the program internally, I recommend that the client feedback be presented to the sales reps in a form that is as unfiltered as possible. Sales reps want to be more productive. If their efforts with prospects can show them how to be more successful in the future, why wouldn’t they get behind this type of effort?

    Friday, December 14, 2007

    A Thought on Winning More Sales from Brian Carroll

    Brian Carroll of InTouch Lead Generation challenged attendees of the Sales Shebang to forget about selling and concentrate on becoming thought leaders in their field.

    Today, potential buyers are really busy with a lot on their plate. They're trying to make the best decision for their company, but they don't always have the time on their own to do exhaustive research. They're also delaying meetings with sales people until the really late stages of the buying process.

    For sellers, this is a problem. There's no time to nurture a potential buyer through the sales process, or even to develop trust that their product/service is the best fit for this situation.
    In fact, sellers even run the risk of antagonizing their potential buyers. A friendly call to check on the buyer can easily be interpreted as pressure to buy.

    Brian told attendees at the Sales Shebang that they needed to change what they know about selling.

    Sellers today are more effective not when they contact someone who is ready to buy, but when they contact someone BEFORE they're ready to buy.

    http://sellingtobigcompanies.blogs.com/selling/2007/11/sales-shebang-l.html

    Monday, December 3, 2007

    Why Do Sales Teams LOSE? – Failing to Do Homework (8-10)

    As mentioned, I’m going to present reasons why companies win and lose sales deals. These reasons were outlined by Ron Sathoff, a colleague of mine, in a great article for SAMA magazine called “Five Ways to Bolster Your Strategic Account Strategy, and Five Ways to Sabotage it.” (The article is available for download HERE)

    This article was written to help answer the ultimate sales question, “How can we win a lot more deals?” In order to find the answer, Ron started by addressing the questions, “Why do we win and why do we lose?” Each of these points were taken from a library of thousands of win loss sales debriefs and compiled into performance rankings.

    8. Fail to do your homework.

    Another criterion associated with the Strategic Account Manager that had a negative gap was understanding and addressing the customer’s business needs. As with responsiveness, meeting the business needs of the customer was more often noticed when something went wrong. In these cases, account managers damaged their chances of a success when they failed to take the time to research the customer’s industry, company and particular situation. As one respondent commented, the first step to understanding the business needs of a customer is asking the right questions:


    “I sat down with [Company 1] and said, ’Here are the 17 technical things that I am concerned about.’ They came back and asked more questions to understand how we do business and then gave me responses, whereas when I sat down with [Company 2], they said, ’Yes we can do that,‘ and I just didn't feel that same comfort that it was really taking the time to understand how we do business.”

    By choosing not to take the time to fully understand the needs and requirements of the customer, an account manager can ensure that his or her organization will not be selected, or that there will be major problems later on if the company is selected. On the other hand, account managers who do their homework about the needs of the customer and the problems it faces can address those issues directly, reinforcing the value of the offering.

    Friday, November 30, 2007

    Why Do Sales Teams LOSE? – Lack of Responsiveness (7-10)

    As mentioned, I’m going to present reasons why companies win and lose sales deals. These reasons were outlined by Ron Sathoff, a colleague of mine, in a great article for SAMA magazine called “Five Ways to Bolster Your Strategic Account Strategy, and Five Ways to Sabotage it.” (The article is available for download HERE)

    This article was written to help answer the ultimate sales question, “How can we win a lot more deals?” In order to find the answer, Ron started by addressing the questions, “Why do we win and why do we lose?” Each of these points were taken from a library of thousands of win loss sales debriefs and compiled into performance rankings.

    7. Take your time responding to requests.

    One of the surprises of this study’s findings was the fact that many of the criteria associated with Strategic Account Managers (SAMs) (such as responsiveness, the relationship with the account team and presentation) showed negative gaps. From these findings, it appears as if the best account managers often go unnoticed, whereas any negative behavior in the sales process is remembered by the potential customer. Nowhere is this more evident than in responsiveness. Very few respondents mentioned the responsiveness of the SAM as a reason for selecting a supplier. Problems with responsiveness, however, were noticed and mentioned as a primary reason for eliminating a supplier from the evaluation process. An example of how to create a negative impression was provided by a respondent, who explained:
    “[Company 1] was slow in getting around to pricing. The people that put on the presentation basically said, ’We will have to get back to you on that,’ and they never got back to us on that. It seemed very lethargic about getting back to us and getting us figures. It was like it was saying, ‘Let us go back and sharpen our pencils some more and take another two or three weeks.’”
    The issue of responsiveness seems to be like a car engine: you don’t notice how it is performing until something goes wrong. A lack of responsiveness could quickly erode any sort of relationship that has been carefully built, regardless of other factors. Customers want to receive value sooner rather than later, and if the customer experiences responsiveness problems during the evaluation process, it can indicate that there may be problems with the supplier later in the relationship.

    Thursday, November 29, 2007

    Competitive Intelligence Newsletter – Before Battle, Know Your Competition

    This week, the cover story by Thayne Johnson provides an insightful look into competitive intelligence methods that show competitor movements in real time.. You’ll also find information on how Sales Intelligence matters to your success. Finally, a report from ES Research Group will help your sales leadership make sense of sales effectiveness enhancement companies.

    Cover Story
    Sun Tzu Says Know Your Competition
    By Thayne Johnson, Primary IntelligenceThe war of business may not be carried out with weapons of war, but battles over prospects, budgets and market share are fought every day. The casualties of war are growth, personal opportunity and in some cases, companies that fall by the wayside. Just like in an army, every member of a business has to take a part in the competitive nature of the business battleground...(For more, click here)

    Announcing the 2008 Sales Training Vendor Guide
    Corporations continue to spend a significant portion of their revenues on sales training. Unchanged from last year, enterprises spend between $4 billion and $7 billion per year training sales professionals. Of all the excellent sales training vendors out there, only a few are a fit for your organization. This ESR/InDepth™ Report is designed to help your organization increase the return on your sales training investment.
    ES Research Group has compiled their findings into a 200 page report. This 3rd party evaluation is a “must read” for companies seeking sales performance enhancement.
    For a free summary, CLICK HERE.

    BlogCentral
    What is Sales Intelligence and Why Does it Matter?
    If a business exists to make money (and really, what other purpose does the business entity have?) as efficiently as possible, and the role of sales is to create the revenue streams as effectively as possible, then isn’t sales intelligence...(For more, click here)

    The A-List Archive
    Brookhaven Memorial Hospital Selects Siemens. What Were the Key Value Factors?
    Originally Published in December 2004.
    Executives at Brookhaven Memorial Hospital wanted to enhance their medical information systems by upgrading and expanding their current technology. An evaluation of MEDITECH, Eclipsys, and Siemens resulted in the selection of a number of Siemens applications, including several from its Soarian product line. Although Siemens was the incumbent provider, this had very little to do with the decision...(For more, click here)

    Monday, November 19, 2007

    Why Do Sales Teams Win? – Fix Problems Now (5-10)

    As mentioned, I’m going to present reasons why companies win and lose sales deals. These reasons were outlined by Ron Sathoff, a colleague of mine, in a great article for SAMA magazine called “Five Ways to Bolster Your Strategic Account Strategy, and Five Ways to Sabotage it.” (The article is available for download HERE)

    This article was written to help answer the ultimate sales question, “How can we win a lot more deals?” In order to find the answer, Ron started by addressing the questions, “Why do we win and why do we lose?” Each of these points were taken from a library of thousands of win loss sales debriefs and compiled into performance rankings.

    5. Address needs and problems before they become disasters.

    With any account, it is inevitable that problems will occur. According to the interview responses, what distinguished a strong account strategy from a weak one was how the SAM addressed these problems. Respondents indicated that openness about problems, and a proactive approach to addressing them, overcame any negative impressions that came from the problem itself.

    In one set of interviews, respondents discussed how their chosen supplier addressed a serious problem. This supplier, rather than trying to hide the problems of its project or offering a bandage approach by fixing symptomatic problems only as they appeared, stopped the project so that it could address the fundamental issues completely. While this caused some initial disappointment, the supplier actually gained in credibility with its decision:

    “We thought [Company 1] was showing its partnership ability by being more open than some of the other suppliers. I would rather have my suppliers say, ’OK, we have a problem and we have to fix it,’ than just pretend it is not there, which makes us suffer through it. So, I appreciate the supplier’s honesty. I feel it was the right thing to do, and that [Company 1] is the right partner.”
    Respondents explained that the supplier’s openness in addressing the problem prevented a much larger delay from occurring later on. In addition, this approach demonstrated the supplier’s dedication to the success of the project and the customers’ satisfaction.

    As an added benefit, using this approach also tells customers that any future difficulties will be handled in an open and professional manner, easing any fears that they may have about getting into a situation where they will not receive support. If they know that their problems will be solved, they will be more confident about the offering and the supplier, and more likely to report difficulties, which can help account managers prevent similar problems occurring with other customers.

    Friday, November 16, 2007

    Why Do Sales Teams Win? – Create a “Dream Team” (4-10)

    As mentioned, I’m going to present reasons why companies win and lose sales deals. These reasons were outlined by Ron Sathoff, a colleague of mine, in a great article for SAMA magazine called “Five Ways to Bolster Your Strategic Account Strategy, and Five Ways to Sabotage it.” (The article is available for download HERE)

    This article was written to help answer the ultimate sales question, “How can we win a lot more deals?” In order to find the answer, Ron started by addressing the questions, “Why do we win and why do we lose?” Each of these points were taken from a library of thousands of win loss sales debriefs and compiled into performance rankings.

    4. Create a “Dream Team” for the account.

    One of the important criteria mentioned by respondents was developing an early relationship with the entire support team. For strategic account managers, this meant introducing key technical personnel during the evaluation process. As one respondent explained, working with the people he would be relying upon for technical support made him more confident entering into a relationship:

    “[Company 1] was more than willing to send out some of their best technical guys to work with my developers. [Company 2] would not. So, [Company 1] was much more responsive. It wasn’t price; it was the people.”
    By embracing a “team approach” early in the account strategy, SAMs in these cases were able to demonstrate that the totality of their organizations were dedicated to serving the customers’ needs. As with the prior principles, this strategy is based on reducing the ambiguity of the business relationship for the customer. By introducing key members early in the interaction, customers can be assured that they aren’t getting Prince Charming in the negotiations and a bunch of frogs when it comes to ongoing or technical matters.

    Thursday, November 15, 2007

    Competitive Intelligence Newsletter – Tips for Beginners

    This week, the cover story provides some of the basics that even seasoned competitive intelligence veterans need. You’ll also find information on why sales doesn’t receive as much intelligence as you might like. Finally, a report from ES Research Group will help your sales leadership make sense of sales effectiveness enhancement companies.

    Cover Story
    The Top Three Box Office Flops for Beginning CI Researchers
    By Ron Sathoff, Primary Intelligence
    For a lot of people (myself included), a good piece of Competitive Intelligence research can have all the beauty of a piece of art, such as a poem, a painting—or even a film. Like these art forms, CI can inspire or instruct those who take the time to understand it, and can even effect significant change. However, unlike a beginning filmmaker, whose poor initial efforts may only result in a bit of ridicule at a local film festival, a “flop” from a beginning CI specialist may have some significant consequences—for both the researcher and his or her organization (For more, click here)

    Announcing the 2008 Sales Training Vendor Guide from ES Research Group
    Corporations continue to spend a significant portion of their revenues on sales training. Unchanged from last year, enterprises spend between $4 billion and $7 billion per year training sales professionals. Of all the excellent sales training vendors out there, only a few are a fit for your organization. This ESR/InDepth™ Report is designed to help your organization increase the return on your sales training investment.
    ES Research Group has compiled their findings into a 200 page report. This 3rd party evaluation is a “must read” for companies seeking sales performance enhancement.
    For a free summary, CLICK HERE.

    BlogCentral
    Why Doesn't Competitive Intelligence Flow to Sales?
    Only 56% of sales managers claim competitive intelligence as one of their tools. A higher percentage of sales reps (68%) say that they use competitive intelligence to sell. All this seems to beg the question… why isn’t the sales department organizing competitive intelligence initiatives more often (For more, click here)

    The A-List Archive
    A-List – R-G Crown Selects S1 over Fundtech for Online Banking Services
    Originally Published in June 2005.
    R-G Crown Bank acquired 18 banks from SouthTrust Bank in October 2004 and wanted to implement new online banking solutions in order to provide better service to its customers and satisfy federal banking regulators (For more, click here)

    Monday, November 12, 2007

    Why Do Sales Teams Win? – Let your past success lead to future success (3-10)

    As mentioned, I’m going to present reasons why companies win and lose sales deals. These reasons were outlined by Ron Sathoff, a colleague of mine, in a great article for SAMA magazine called “Five Ways to Bolster Your Strategic Account Strategy, and Five Ways to Sabotage it.” (The article is available for download HERE)

    This article was written to help answer the ultimate sales question, “How can we win a lot more deals?” In order to find the answer, Ron started by addressing the questions, “Why do we win and why do we lose?” Each of these points were taken from a library of thousands of win loss sales debriefs and compiled into performance rankings.

    3. Let your past success lead to future success.

    Strong relationships and successful partnerships not only lead to future sales with the customers themselves; they also serve as the foundation for accounts with other customers. Whether it is through word-of-mouth, seeing what other companies in the industry were using or by checking with reference companies that had been provided by the supplier, many respondents mentioned that the knowledge that a product was being utilized successfully in other locations was a factor in their decision to select a supplier.

    References were the deciding point in several of the interviews. In one case, a supplier was chosen because of the references it provided, even though its product was significantly more expensive than its competitor’s offering:

    “We narrowed it down to [Company 1] and [Company 2], and their products were almost identical. What separated [Company 1] and [Company 2] were customer support issues. Every [supplier] that we considered on the short list gave us references, and then we went out and found install sites on our own. [Company 2]’s references, including the ones that they provided to us, were terrible.”
    In another example, a respondent used references as a way of obtaining direct comparisons of competing suppliers. In this case, the references were especially powerful because they came from organizations that had experience with each of the competitors:

    “[Company 1]’s references were extremely strong. One reference company had actually worked with [Company 2] previously and within the previous year had moved over, so it was a good company to talk to about the two competing suppliers, and be able to really compare apples to apples.”
    These cases illuminate the role of references in a well-developed account strategy. They not only provided examples of satisfied customers and successful relationships; in cases where they were chosen judiciously, they demonstrated industry expertise and experience, and provided objective, third-party comparisons of the competing offerings.

    Because of the importance of references, it is vital that account strategies include a carefully designed system for developing and using references. A solid reference program allows a supplier to produce powerful, compelling and current references whenever requested, and prevents the problems that will come with “crossing your fingers” and hoping that your reference will give you a good recommendation.

    Friday, November 9, 2007

    Why Do Sales Teams Win? – Think Relationship (2-10)

    As mentioned, I’m going to present reasons why companies win and lose sales deals. These reasons were outlined by Ron Sathoff, a colleague of mine, in a great article for SAMA magazine called “Five Ways to Bolster Your Strategic Account Strategy, and Five Ways to Sabotage it.” (The article is available for download HERE)

    This article was written to help answer the ultimate sales question, “How can we win a lot more deals?” In order to find the answer, Ron started by addressing the questions, “Why do we win and why do we lose?” Each of these points were taken from a library of thousands of win loss sales debriefs and compiled into performance rankings.

    2. Focus on the relationship, not the sale.

    The heart of strategic account management is developing a strong connection between your company and the customer. By definition, a strategic account is designed to be a long-lasting partnership that is mutually beneficial to both parties. The importance of this relationship can be measured in terms of repeat purchases and customer loyalty. The data confirms the importance of a good relationship: prior experience with a supplier was the second most often cited reason for selection and was mentioned significantly more often in cases where the company was selected as the winning supplier.

    While some of these cases of repeat sales were due to organizational inertia, or the unwillingness to change suppliers because it was prohibitively difficult or expensive, many of the comments made by respondents indicated that the repeat business was due to the relationship that had developed between the supplier and the customer. The liaison between the two, of course, was the account manager, and those who made it their job to keep in constant communication had the edge over those who only communicated during new opportunities for sales. As one respondent explained, it was important that the SAM cared about all aspects of the relationship:
    “[Company 1]’s support is awesome. We have nothing but wonderful comments for the sales representative. I e-mail or call anybody and it always gets back to the sales representative and I get a call from him to make sure it was all done correctly. It gives me peace of mind.”
    One aspect of the respondent’s descriptions of their relationships with suppliers that stood out was the importance of the relationship during difficult times. For example, one respondent explained why her company had created lasting relationships with two suppliers:

    “We had built up a very good relationship with both agencies over the years. We have been through a couple of years of tough economic times. Both of these agencies have stuck with us. They have been through good times with us, and will stick around for the next round of good times in the near future. It would be very difficult for any other agencies to take our business away from those two.”
    By maintaining the relationship, even when the customer was not be able to give as much business to the supplier as it had in the past, the SAMs were able to create a strong bond that makes it difficult for competitors to win future business opportunities with the customer. The main point of these examples is that corporations do not buy from corporations; people buy from people. As the face of the company, all the interactions with account managers, from the first meeting to the last, set the tone for the entire business relationship.

    Wednesday, November 7, 2007

    Why Do Sales Teams Win Deals? Reason 1of 10

    Over the next few posts, I’m going to present reasons why companies win and lose sales deals. These reasons were outlined by Ron Sathoff, a colleague of mine, in a great article for SAMA magazine called “Five Ways to Bolster Your Strategic Account Strategy, and Five Ways to Sabotage it.” (The article is available for download HERE)

    This article was written to help answer the ultimate sales question, “How can we win a lot more deals?” In order to find the answer, Ron started by addressing the questions, “Why do we win and why do we lose?”

    Let’s get started.

    By way of background, as part of our win loss interviews, respondents were asked for the primary reasons why they did or did not select the supplier. Ron coded and tabulated the open-ended responses, analyzing them for performance gaps, or areas where a response was more prevalent in one situation (selection or elimination) than in the other. This was done in order to determine which criteria had the largest impact for selection or elimination. The criteria with the largest gaps are presented in the table below. Positive gaps indicate that a criterion was mentioned more often as a reason for selection, and a negative gap indicates that a criterion was mentioned more often as a reason for elimination.

    For example, industry usage had a positive gap of 2.8%. This indicates that respondents were slightly more likely to mention product features as a reason for selection than they were as a reason for not selecting a supplier. The largest gaps indicate where there are opportunities to stand out in areas that are most noticed by the customer, as well as areas where doing the wrong thing will have a significant impact on your chance for success.

    1. Let your product speak for itself.

    A product’s features and functionality had the largest positive gap, indicating that respondents were much more likely to mention product features positively, and that product features were more likely to have a positive influence than a negative one. It is therefore advantageous to point out a product’s strengths to a potential customer

    Specific features of a product are especially important because the customer will often be concerned about the product’s ability to meet the precise needs of multiple users and locations, as well as the product’s ability to integrate with other systems already in place. It is therefore vital that customers are not only informed about the product’s specifications, but that they have also been shown how those specifications are translated to the reality of the company’s business needs.

    One way that Strategic Account Managers (SAMs) have accomplished this is through the use of product-oriented presentations and demonstrations. When used in conjunction with technical materials, these demonstrations helped to make the product features and functionality more comprehensible, and showed that the SAM was not overstating the product’s capabilities. Most importantly, they helped to make the customer feel more comfortable that the product would meet their needs and that their staff would have the ability to use it effectively. For example, one respondent explained that the evaluation team was not confident about its first choice of product until the SAM could organize a demonstration of features and functionality for them:

    “We had a demonstration, and that reassured me that we were making the right decision. For one thing, the whole layout of the computer screens was superior. There were just a lot of little things. It reassured me that we were making the right decision.”

    By allaying any fears the customer may have had about the product, the SAM in this situation helped boost the customer’s confidence in both the sale and the business relationship. Customers today actively seek solutions that can create value for the organization in the shortest period of time. As a result, account managers need to do whatever they can to prove that their offering will work in the actual usage situation.

    Monday, November 5, 2007

    Sales Intelligence: Why Do We Win? Why Do We Lose?

    A little while back, Ron Sathoff, a colleague of mine, wrote a great article for SAMA magazine called “Five Ways to Bolster Your Strategic Account Strategy, and Five Ways to Sabotage it.” (The article is available for download HERE)

    This article was written to help answer the ultimate sales question, “How can we win a lot more deals?” In order to find the answer, Ron started by addressing the questions, “Why do we win and why do we lose?”

    Primary Intelligence, a company that specializes in competitive intelligence, sales intelligence and win loss analysis, is in the unique place of having answered the question dozens of thousands of times for hundreds of companies. At heart, our goal is to help companies increase their sales success. This might happen by discovering new markets, improving sales rep performance or showing where company improvement must take place.

    (Enough advertisement… for the moment)

    The foundation of intelligence that we have built over the past ten years provided Ron with the ability to distill these reasons into the 5 of each (winners and losers). Over the next few posts, I’ll look at each of the ten reasons and provide additional information where possible.

    If you have to answer these same questions, stick with me and see what you can learn.

    As an introduction, I’ll provide a little bit of numeric information to get whet your appetite.

    As part of our win loss interviews, respondents were asked for the primary reasons why they did or did not select the supplier. Ron coded and tabulated the open-ended responses, analyzing them for performance gaps, or areas where a response was more prevalent in one situation (selection or elimination) than in the other. This was done in order to determine which criteria had the largest impact for selection or elimination. The criteria with the largest gaps are presented in the table below. Positive gaps indicate that a criterion was mentioned more often as a reason for selection, and a negative gap indicates that a criterion was mentioned more often as a reason for elimination.



    For example, industry usage had a positive gap of 2.8%. This indicates that respondents were slightly more likely to mention product features as a reason for selection than they were as a reason for not selecting a supplier. The largest gaps indicate where there are opportunities to stand out in areas that are most noticed by the customer, as well as areas where doing the wrong thing will have a significant impact on your chance for success.

    Over the next few posts, we’ll flesh out each of these ideas until they make lots of sense. If don’t right, you’ll have a much better view of how your company can make improvements with current resources.

    Stick with me. I’ll make it worth it.

    Monday, October 29, 2007

    Competitive Intelligence Webinar Wrap-up – Three Benefits of Win Loss

    Last Thursday, Ron Sathoff and I co-hosted a webinar on the topic of Win Loss. Over the years, Primary Intelligence has conducted dozens of thousands of sales debriefs for our clients and some major benefits have bubbled to the surface. Yesterday, we took time to discuss each of the following topics:


    1. Actionable Competitive Intelligence

    2. Analytics to predict ROI

    3. Win back programs

    Of course, one of the prime benefits of Win Loss analysis is the fact that your sales teams can sell more effectively with intelligence. But, the benefits extend much deeper than that. When Win Loss is done properly, the competitive intelligence that it generates can improve marketing, product development and corporate strategy just while providing the competitive boost for sales.

    You may also want to consider a test run of two free win loss reports, based on your own sales opportunities. If you are new to PI, you might qualify for a test drive. If you have some interested in this, send me an email and let me know (cdalley@primary-intel.com)

    If you would like to download a copy of the presentation, please click HERE

    Wednesday, October 24, 2007

    Another Endorsement for Win Loss Analysis

    One of our clients in the Blue Cross Blue Shield network was kind enough to provide an assessment of the success of their win loss program, which they have outsourced to Primary Intelligence:

    “The real value of the Primary Intelligence System to us, is their uncanny ability to drill through Producers directly to Group Leaders and Group Decision makers and engage them at a level denied to us over and over again.

    At that level, Primary Intelligence uncovered the truth, the real drivers of decisions on healthcare, and gave us the opportunity to address those directly the following year.

    We won back 7 of the 30 losses the previous year and those wins were driven by knowing the truth.” - Senior Healthcare Intelligence Analyst

    If you are considering a win loss program, you might consider the following:

  • How much more successful would your company be at selling new deals if you really knew why you win and lose?
  • How much revenue would you gain if your company could win back 23% of lost sales within 12-24 months?
  • What would the ROI be if you were able to create a more solid “win” and increase the likelihood that your current client base would stay with you longer?

  • These are the results that Primary Intelligence delivers daily. If you are missing out, let’s chat.

    You can join our webinar tomorrow (2PM ET, Regiester HERE) or we can talk. (cdalley@primary-intel.com, 801-838-9600 x5050)

    Tuesday, October 16, 2007

    Webinar Invitation - Three Benefits of Win Loss You Can't Ignore

    In the last five years, Win Loss analysis has gone from a little known niche project to a recognized best practice. In the most progressive companies, executives demand that sales, marketing, and product development listen to Win Loss feedback and work together to become more competitive.

    The opportunity to increase your sales and marketing success sits right at your doorstep. But, do you have everything you need to achieve the greatest potential? Can you make simple changes that will result in gargantuan increases?

    Primary Intelligence would like to invite you to a presentation that will show:
    • How to increase market share with predictive analytics
    • Competitive Intelligence with insight rarely seen
    • Win back programs that really work

    Date:
    Thursday, October 25, 2007

    Time:
    2:00 PM - 3:00 PM EDT
    1:00 PM - 2:00 CDT
    12:00 PM - 1:00 PM MDT
    11:00 AM - 12:00 PM PDT

    REGISTER HERE

    Those that will benefit include:
    • Marketing leaders
    • Market research managers
    • Market and Industry analysts
    • Product development managers
    • Sales leaders
    • Corporate leadership positions (CEO, CMO, CSO)

    Space is limited.
    Reserve your Webinar seat now

    https://www.gotomeeting.com/register/913347113

    Monday, October 15, 2007

    Sales Intelligence and Win Back Campaigns

    There is always an element of uncertainty in the purchase decision. Prospects are always concerned that they are being sold a bill of goods rather than a real solution. Of course, there are many processes in place to evaluate competing vendors and their products, but it is difficult to be 100% certain until the product, service, or solution is completely installed and integrated with all of the other processes in the company.

    You know this is true. A certain percentage of your clients wonder why they chose you. Sometimes, it takes Herculean efforts to keep new clients happy until they can realize the potential of your offering.

    If this happens to you, it must also happen to your competitors. And within that reality resides the opportunity.

    New prospects can be very tender, having not yet built up a loyalty toward their new vendor. It is during this time that they may be most susceptible to a renewed sales effort from your company. At the least, you should procure as much feedback as possible to understand how you can compete more effectively next time around with the same company. After a lost sales attempt, how capable are you of knowing your chances of reacquiring that prospect in the near future?

    Benefits
    A large percentage of buyers surveyed who recently dismissed a key supplier reported choosing another supplier that offered basically the same product or service. This finding indicates that the lost account’s needs have not changed and can still be filled by the dismissed supplier.

    Importantly, buyers also report their dismissed suppliers do not even attempt to win them back. Only 25% reported the dismissed supplier offered an apology and only 14% of buyers said dismissed suppliers adopted a keep-in-touch strategy with them.



    Marketing
    Proper post-decision systems will reveal whether a “prospect that got away” is content with its new vendor. While most prospects make the “right decision” for their company, a surprisingly large group are either disenchanted or outright disgusted with their new vendor. With this in mind, identifying these companies while the sales relationship has not yet cooled may provide greater opportunities once the existing contract ends.

    Sales
    Provide a sales professional with a list of companies that would likely defect from their current vendor and you’ll have a friend for life. After all, your sales organization already has a relationship with the prospect and probably made it to the final cut. If your company can assure the prospect that you were all set to deliver on the sales promises, the sales success rate increases.

    Recommendations
    Make a consistent effort to capitalize on spent sales efforts. A win-back program based on those sales opportunities that were almost yours may be a productive source of business in the near future.
    Use a third-party vendor to consistently gather post-sales data and improve response rates.
    Consider how unbiased feedback will provide realistic expectations for your company.